How does the mainstream media justify mentioning only three Republican names as "viable candidates" (Giuliani, McCain, Romney) when NOT ONE of those men is drawing as much interest (let alone more interest) than Ron Paul?  

 

Screenshots of Alexa current week website rankings (As of 5.10.07 - The lower the number, the better.)

 

RonPaul2008.com  31,220

 

MittRomney.com  54,279

 

JohnMccain.com 71,422

 

JoinRudy2008.com  85,702

 

To put this in perspective, the mainstream media is ignoring Ron Paul as if he were just like all the other "ignored candidates." Well, let's have a look at some of their current week website stats:

 

Tom Tancredo: 302,371

 

Sam Brownback: 436,827

 

Mike Huckabee: 545,375

 

Tommy Thompson: 578,096

 

Duncan Hunter: 623,668

 

Jim Gilmore (Not enough visits to register)

 

So again: How exactly is the mainstream media PRETENDING to justify putting Ron Paul in the same category as these other "ignored candidates" when interest in his campaign not only destroys all of their campaigns, but also exceeds that of the "three media darlings?"

And while we're at it, now is a good time to bring up these polls which are equally telling:  http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/090507totalvictory.htm